Topics

Archives

Disclaimer

All contents of this site are ©Copyright 2006- 2011 by Adam C.F. MacDonald. All rights reserved.

All opinions expressed here are my own and have not been endorsed or reflect the opinions of my current or past employers.

Meta

How an Economy (and a Culture) Fails

Samsung

Loss of confidence coincides with a general loss of hope.  It means there is no trust in a better tomorrow, or at least the chance for progress.  As it escalates, one can feel like there’s an increasing certainty that one’s children and grandchildren will not be better off or even more secure.  These are old and authentic feelings that all people have encountered, particularly when it comes to their governments/rulers.

When you look at history cursorily — what happened to Rome, Central America pre-Columbus, the Dark Ages in Ancient Greece — whatever epoch changing moment you can identify when there was wholesale dislocation and people abandoned their cities and economies, there was a loss of faith involved.  The economies stopped working because people no longer believed there was anything worth trading, and consequently, there was no stability.  People stopped trusting institutions and didn’t care and/or didn’t have the resources to support anything but themselves until their infrastructure — military, sanitary, agriculture, trade — was completely unsustainable and could no longer support itself.  The so-called barbarian invasions in Rome were actually more incremental, and were really the last straw that broke everything.  The decline had been going on for much longer.

That malaise is definitely now in America.  Mixed with anxiety and anger, there’s an increasing worry that things not only are not getting better, but in fact the signs of economic progress that do exist are fraudulent.

A Lack of Integrity, Facebook Inconsistent With Its Own Policies

It looks like the spine tingling sense of dread between Facebook members after they see an ad appear about a keyword they may have just mentioned has merit:

“Facebook, MySpace, and several other social networking sites have been sending data to advertising companies that could be used to find consumers’ names and other personal details, despite promises they don’t share such information without consent. The practice, which most of the companies defended, sends user names or ID numbers tied to personal profiles being viewed when users click on ads. After questions were raised by The Wall Street Journal, Facebook and MySpace moved to make changes. By Thursday morning Facebook had rewritten some of the offending computer code. … Several large advertising companies … including Google Inc.’s DoubleClick and Yahoo Inc.’s Right Media, said they were unaware of the data being sent to them from the social networking sites, and said they haven’t made use of it. … The sites may have been breaching their own privacy policies as well as industry standards. … Those policies have been put forward by advertising and Internet companies in arguments against the need for government regulation.” [WSJ 5/21/10]

Online Privacy -- Equivocal Identity, Predictable History

Ironically, there seems to be a consistent reaction to impresario Mark Zuckerberg’s bon mots that enabling widely distributed details about yourself outside of Facebook is an example of a “lack of integrity.”

“You have one identity,”… “The days of you having a different image for your work friends or co-workers and for the other people you know are probably coming to an end pretty quickly.” He adds: “Having two identities for yourself is an example of a lack of integrity.”

“Quit Facebook Day” is gaining ground and the problem over Facebook’s tactics is becoming more well understood in the maintstream media.  Maybe there is not a disparate, equivocal set of feelings among people about how they feel about privacy and their identity and that of their families and friends?

Ubiquity, Privacy, Integrity: Your 2 Choices Online

Old media genuflects to the new.   Twitter and Facebook get mentioned and appealed to for news regularly by TV and magazines.  So it’s not surprising when mainstream media outlets overlook Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s feelings on privacy.  It’s not in the interest of old media to criticize an important source of advertising.  But the failures and contradictions and self-interested actions Facebook has taken lately to stem criticism over privacy concerns are slowly becoming harder to ignore by the public.  When the New York Times can spot that Facebook’s privacy policy has more words than the US Constitution something is developing.

[...]

On Privacy -- Conclusion

Previous: Introduction, Right to Privacy (part 1), (part 2), (part 3)

Claiming that privacy is about transactions and that being private is the recess of information is not immediately clear. Yet, the common logic that something is private so long as it is not published means that what we value and retain as confidential must concern what we can potentially divulge and obtain. The right to privacy and its conflicts are within this order. But to encourage another view – where being private is not tied to any one thing — allows us to consider another way of conceiving how privacy should be respected.